Accessibility Standards, Untangled: Which Ones Actually Apply to You?
Your web team mentions WCAG. Your tech team mentions ADA. Your EU partners mention EN 301 549. Your compliance officer brings up Section 508. Your French subsidiary references RGAAv4. And everyone's using different terms like they all mean the same thing.
They don't.
Here's the thing: they're not all talking about the same stuff. These standards aren't rivals competing for the same job; they're genuinely different beasts. Some are laws. Some are technical guidelines. Some are ways of testing. Your compliance team is talking about regulations; your developers are talking about technical checklists; your EU partner is talking about a completely different regulatory framework. They all use the word "accessibility," but they're addressing different problems.
The good news
Sorting this out is far less painful than it looks. Give it five minutes and you'll know which standards actually apply to you, what each one really means, and what it expects of you in practice.
One quick note before you dive in: this guide is general information to help you get oriented, it isn't professional compliance advice. Accessibility laws and standards change, and exactly how they apply depends on your specific situation. Treat it as a starting point, and confirm your obligations with a qualified accessibility or compliance professional before making compliance decisions.
Quick Answer: Which Standards Apply to You?
Answer these three questions, and you'll know exactly which standards matter for your organisation.
Question 1: Where does your business primarily operate?
United States only
European Union
Both U.S. and EU
Global (multiple regions)
Question 2: Who do you primarily serve?
Consumers (e-commerce, SaaS, digital services)
Government agencies (federal, state, or local)
Both consumers and government
Question 3: Do you handle government contracts?
Yes, federal government contracts
Yes, state or local government contracts
No government contracts
Now find your situation in the table below:
What Each Standard Actually Is
Now that you know which standards apply to you, here's what you're actually dealing with.
What Comes Next
So where do you go from here? Three steps will get you most of the way.
Step 1: Confirm your baseline. Test your site and digital products against WCAG 2.2 AA or WCAG 2.1 AA if that's what your region asks for. Everything else builds on this one, so it's the place to start. Not sure where you currently stand? An accessibility audit is the fastest way to find out.
Step 2: Layer on regional requirements.If you operate in multiple jurisdictions, don't test each standard separately. Start with WCAG as your foundation, then add the regional regulatory layers that apply to your markets. For example: WCAG 2.2 AA (global baseline) + ADA Title III (U.S.) + EAA (EU) + RGAAv4 (France, if applicable).
Step 3: Set up continuous monitoring. Accessibility used to be a once-a-year audit. That doesn't cut it anymore. Standards keep moving (WCAG 2.2 landed in October 2023; the EAA went live in June 2025), rules shift, and your own content changes by the week. The organisations that stay on top of it are the ones watching continuously and catching issues as they appear not the ones checking in every now and then.
Tools like SiteBeacon watch your site against WCAG 2.2, ADA, EAA, EN 301 549, Section 508, and RGAAv4 all at once. Instead of juggling a separate tool or manual audit for every standard, one monitoring platform keeps an eye on the lot and flags problems the moment they crop up.
For detailed technical guidance on WCAG, visit the W3C resource centre .
For ADA-specific information, the U.S. Department of Justice publishes ongoing guidance. For EAA and EN 301 549, the European Commission and ETSI maintain current resources. For RGAAv4, the French digital accessibility authority (DINUM) provides granular implementation guidance.
Key Takeaways
WCAG 2.2 is the foundation. Everything else either points back to it or builds on top. 87 testable criteria, and Level AA is the bar most people need to hit.
ADA Title II has a hard deadline. State and local governments need to be compliant by April 26, 2028. (Title III, for private businesses, has no federal deadline but enforcement is very much live.)
The EAA is live now. Enforcement started on June 28, 2025. If you serve EU consumers, this is a now problem, not a someday one.
EN 301 549 extends beyond websites. It's the EU technical standard covering web, software, hardware and documents built on WCAG 2.1 AA, but reaching well beyond the web.
Section 508 applies to federal contractors. It's the U.S. procurement rule that asks for WCAG conformance, usually checked with the DHS Trusted Tester method.
RGAAv4 is France-specific but built on WCAG. Required for the French public sector and large organisations (€250 million or more in annual turnover).
One baseline, regional layers. Build to WCAG 2.2 AA everywhere, then add the regional standards on top. They're not rivals, just local extensions of the same shared foundation.
Quick Compliance Checklist
Keep this handy for your jurisdiction:
Operating in the U.S. only:
Identify if you're ADA Title II (government), Title III (private business), or Section 508 (federal contractor)
Test your website to WCAG 2.2 AA standard
If ADA Title II: plan for April 26, 2028 deadline
If ADA Title III or Section 508: set up continuous monitoring
Operating in the EU:
Confirm if EAA applies (consumer-facing digital products)
Test to WCAG 2.1 AA (via EN 301 549)
If EAA applies: treat compliance as mandatory (enforcement active)
If selling to government: consider EN 301 549 conformance
Operating in France:
Check if RGAAv4 applies (public sector or €250 million+ turnover)
If applicable: implement RGAAv4 standards (WCAG 2.1 AA plus French-specific requirements)
If not applicable: consider RGAAv4 as best practice guidance
Operating globally:
Build to WCAG 2.2 AA as global baseline
Map all applicable regional standards (ADA, EAA, EN 301 549, RGAAv4, Section 508)
Set up continuous monitoring across all applicable standards
Establish quarterly review cycle for regulatory updates in each market.
